Here are 2 ladies with the World Bank: Juergen Voegelle & Yvonne Pinto who write 08 June 2025 about “A Smarter Way To Grow Rice” (World Bank Blogs, logs.worldbank.org):
“Smarter investments in rice could lift millions
out of poverty and boost economic growth in producing countries – by raising
farmer incomes, making food more affordable, and creating jobs across the value
chain” (https://getwallpapers.com/image,
image from the site).
Easier said than done!
As an agriculturist (UP Los Baños 1965 graduate) and
afterwards turned creative journalist (self-taught, so far UPLB’s historical one-and-only
“Outstanding Alumnus for Creative Writing”), today I look at the scene quite
differently – only wholistic farming will deliver the goods
and the good!
Breeding a different kind of rice is already too
much science to me – when will we stop? Having been The Editor In Chief of so many agriculture-related
publications in the Philippines – like (1) Canopy,
a monthly on forestry published in semi-popular language; (2) Habitat, a forestry quarterly color
magazine patterned after the American National
Geographic – both Canopy and Habitat published by the Forest Research Institute (FORI, now
ERDB), and (3) Philippine Journal of Crop
Science 2001-2008 (published
by the Federation of Crop Science
Societies of the Philippines), I
look at the problem quite differently! We should instead:
(1)
Emphasize farmer’s income.
(2)
Emphasize consumer health starting with
the grain’s healthiness itself.
And the only way to do that is to grow crops by junking
chemical fertilizers and pesticides and growing
them the natural ways!
Half of humanity eats rice. But behind the
ubiquitous staple lies a mounting crisis. The World Bank authors say:
“The global rice industry is experiencing real
turbulence. Yields are stagnating after decades of intensive farming that have
drained water resources and exhausted the soil.”
That is, after decades of “chemical farming”!
“Many of the 140 million rice farmers in the world
live in poverty – managing tiny plots, exposed to risks and with few
opportunities to diversify.”
Tiny plots? It doesn’t matter if the harvests are
big! That’s the problem – the yields are small compared to the costs.
With Chemical Agriculture (CA), farmers are
cultivating against their own pockets and health!
To save their own skin (and ours as consumers), I
see that farmers have to shift from CA to NA (Natural Agriculture). The costs
of NA materials are negligible: seeds from naturally grown crops, no chemicals
necessary!
Here is my list of NA methods:
(1) Cover Cropping,
(2) Crop Rotation,
(3) Farm Crops + Tree Crops (Agroforestry),
(4) Green Manuring,
(5) Intercropping,
(6) Multiple Cropping,
(7) No-Till Farming,
(8) Organic Fertilization,
(9) Ratooning,
(10) Rotational Grazing,
(11) “Three Sisters” Planting,
(12) Trap Cropping, and
(13) Trash Mulching.
Yes, the Lucky 13 is being taught in the #1
university of agriculture in the Philippines – UP Los Baños – but not
seriously. As far as I know, none of the UPLB methods being seriously taught is
farmer-friendly and community-friendly!
When
will UPLB learn Natural Agriculture
principles and teach those 13 methods, seriously, institutionally?@517
No comments:
Post a Comment