My very first essay on “Find-That-Moment Photography” – a term I invented just now. At almost 81, I have found that journalists in print media do not trouble themselves going after “memorable shots” – if they have a camera at all. To thrill or not to thrill, that is the question!
In the
upper image, Paul M Gutierrez
shares Joe Galvez’ 07-July-2021
Facebook post describing “the best training ground for photojournalists” thus:
In the rites of
passage, (people) usually need to undergo only one gauntlet to become what they
are. But in photojournalism, it takes more than one baptism of fire to be a
full-fledged photojournalist.
(upper images from Facebook)
No problem. I’m thinking of journalists, not Mr Galvez’
photojournalists, taking photographs while taking notes for their stories. Why
not? With sophisticated cellphones taking images of excellent quality,
journalists should be able to “illustrate” their stories with their own charming
photographs of the scene or interview.
The lower image was taken by me 24 June 2018 with my Lumix FZ100, looking “through” the
milking carabao shed early morning across the Amancio
Farm Hotel in Cordon, Isabela (visit courtesy of Noime Liangco). From color to B&W, still there is drama.
I took many shots of a scene and the whole farm. Behind 50 years
of off-and-on taking photographs at that time, having read technical
instructions for photography – and having
studied the masters of painting at the excellent library of Xavier University
in Cagayan De Oro City in 1968 – I look at a scene differently from the
“ordinary eye.”
A
“smart” photograph like that attracts the eyes of readers, doesn’t it? Even if
the story is dull or uninteresting.
To be clear, I’m a journalist – if self-taught and
self-styled – but I have always taken any number of photographs to share any
number of them since 1980 when I founded and became Editor In Chief of Habitat, quarterly color magazine of the
Los Baños-based Forest Research Institute
(now Ecosystems Research & Development Bureau), a publication I patterned
after the American National Geographic
(editorially admitted).
Mr Galvez says:
Photojournalism is not
about photography, per se, but a practice that entails risks and even death.
Photojournalism is not for the faint-hearted. To become one, he or she needs to
undergo a series of trainings and exposures to any given circumstances in order
to be competitive with other counterparts. And of course, to come home alive
and (unscathed).
I disagree
with all of the above!
Right now I have my Lumix FZ100 digital camera with
Intelligent Auto (iA) that takes care of my settings: focus, lighting, opening,
speed.
With
iA and advanced cellphones, quality photography is now point-and-shoot. Yes.
After many
observations on how photojournalists work, I have come to the conclusion that
the Philippines is so far the best training ground for photojournalists, and
the best setting to practice photojournalism in the world.
I
leave Mr Galvez to his dangerous photography while I’m cheerful taking countless photographs to trail my story
and sometimes to thrill my readers. Even in Agriculture? Yes!@517
No comments:
Post a Comment