Does Maria Ressa deserve the Nobel Peace Prize? Yes!
Does the Nobel Prize Committee deserve applause? No!
More from Filipino faculty & law luminary Mel Sta Maria’s opinion piece published
by Rappler: “[Just Saying] Maria
Ressa’s Nobel Peace Prize Was A Stare-Down[1]”
(14 October 2021, Rappler.com). All 953
words including title, author & date, it’s pro-Maria Ressa; Mr Sta Maria’s
praise is to high heavens:
The imagery I had when
I learned that Maria Ressa won the Nobel Peace Prize was the biblical David
looking down at a defeated Goliath – a stare-down. After so many cases filed
against her, numerous bails posted, a conviction on appeal, so many
vituperations coming from high sources including President Duterte’s accusation
of “fraud,” and the threat of closure of the platform of her advocacies, what
else can be the most compelling rebuttal against all these? The Nobel Peace
Prize. One could not ask for a more definitive vindication coming from a highly
independent, international, and credible source.
Mr Sta Maria’s adulation of Maria Ressa is ultimate:
Many will bash or
sarcastically congratulate Maria Ressa, her award, and probably even the Nobel Peace Prize
Committee, in order to diminish the resounding global significance of this
accolade… The award and its meaning will always gawk them in the face. In law,
we call it res ipsa loquitur (the
thing speaks for itself) and no one can alter that. Add to this the fact that
she is the first Filipina and only female to be a Nobel Laureate in 2021.
Goliath
is PH President Rodrigo Roa Duterte
and David is Maria Ressa – with her Nobel stone, she has struck at the forehead
and the giant has stumbled. The stone is Truth.
Now: Is the Truth the saving of the Philippines as the Stone
was the saving of Israel? Neither! Israel was saved by the Ten Commandments.
The Philippines is not, cannot be saved by Maria Ressa’s – or any Philippine
journalist’s Nobel Peace Prize – as long
as the journalism is only a pursuit of Truth. If truth be told, Maria
Ressa’s journalism certainly cannot pass the “Rotary 4-Way Test” (above image[2] from Rotary Club of Caloundra, Queensland, Australia):
Is it the TRUTH?
Is it FAIR to all concerned?
Will it build GOODWILL and BETTER FRIENDSHIPS?
Will it be BENEFICIAL to all concerned?"
My Maria Ressa’s Rotary 4-Way answers? Maybe. No. No. No.
Mr Sta Maria mentions Maria Ressa’s “advocacies” – wrong; it’s
singular, not plural. She has only Truth. Unfortunately, Maria Ressa’s Truth
Journalism is Negative. Contrast to mine:
iTHINK! Journalism:
Investigate if True;
Investigate if Helpful;
Investigate if Inspiring;
Investigate if Necessary;
Investigate if Kind:
Investigate to THiNK!
What Maria Ressa and all journalists should do is throw
stones at the foreheads of their Goliaths of Truth Journalism and pursue
stories like Positive Community Growth
arising from or based on cooperation
of any and all kinds, technical and popular.
World,
Frank A Hilario is now going to invent
The
Rotary 4-Way Journalism:
True.
Fair.
Builds Goodwill & Better Friendships.
Beneficial to All!@517
[1]https://www.rappler.com/voices/thought-leaders/opinion-maria-ressa-nobel-peace-prize-stare-down
[2]https://rotaryclubcaloundra.com.au/
No comments:
Post a Comment